Apa journal article review Rating:
6,3/10
1375
reviews
An APA journal article review is a critical evaluation of a published research study in the format specified by the American Psychological Association (APA). This type of review is typically used in the field of psychology, but may also be used in other social sciences. The purpose of an APA journal article review is to provide a summary of the main points of the article, evaluate the strengths and limitations of the research, and provide a recommendation for future research.
To write an effective APA journal article review, it is important to start by carefully reading and analyzing the article. As you read, take notes on the main points, research questions, and methods used in the study. Pay particular attention to the research design, sample size, and statistical analyses. It is also important to consider the relevance and implications of the study for the field of psychology or the broader social sciences.
Once you have thoroughly analyzed the article, you can begin to write your review. Start by providing a brief overview of the article, including the title, authors, and publication information. Next, summarize the main points of the article, including the research question, hypotheses, methods, and results. Be sure to include any key findings or implications of the study.
After summarizing the article, evaluate the strengths and limitations of the research. This might include discussing the quality of the research design, sample size, and statistical analyses. It is also important to consider any biases or limitations in the study, such as self-report measures or small sample sizes.
Finally, provide a recommendation for future research. This might include discussing any areas where the study could be improved, or suggesting related topics that could be explored in future research.
Overall, an APA journal article review is a critical evaluation of a published research study that helps to advance the field of psychology or the broader social sciences. By carefully analyzing and evaluating the research, you can contribute to the ongoing dialogue about the topic and help to shape future research in the field.
Citation Management
Authored book Brown, L. Notice how close the incorrect paraphrase is from the original. If an author has multiple studies, the repository landing page should clearly identify how to access the specific type of information for each study and the links. Particularly for the data collection of the undergraduate gamers, there were many opportunities for an in-depth examination of their gaming practices and histories. Weston, PhD University of Oregon, United States Joanne Lee Williams, PhD.
Dubow Bowling Green State University and the University of Michigan Outgoing associate editors Drew H. Psychologists are committed to increasing scientific and professional knowledge of behavior and people's understanding of themselves and others and to the use of such knowledge to improve the condition of individuals, organizations, and society. URL Example Poiger, U. Under no circumstances may this standard be used to justify or defend violating human rights. The minimum line weight for line art is 0.
APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (APA Style JARS)
This information is included to help the reader locate the exact portion of text themselves. Jack Walker, PhD Auburn University, United States Gang Wang, PhD Florida State University, United States Mo Wang, PhD University of Florida, United States Julie Holliday Wayne, PhD Wake Forest University, United States Elijah X. Disclaimer: APA and the editors of Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied assume no responsibility for statements and opinions advanced by the authors of its articles. Opposed reviewers should not be chosen simply because they have different theoretical or methodological perspectives relevant to the submitted paper and may disagree with points in the paper. Public significance statements Authors submitting manuscripts to the journal Developmental Psychology are now required to provide 2β3 brief sentences regarding the relevance or public health significance of their study or review described in their manuscript.
In these cases, use a URL. Example Following, we have an example of a summary and an evaluation of a research article. Affirmative cognitive behavior therapy with sexual and gender minority people. Ethical standards of psychologists. The New Criterion, 15 3 , 5 β13.
The two types of manuscripts differ only in length, commensurate to different scope of intended contribution. Smith Washington , PhD Oklahoma State University, United States Troy A. As used in this Ethics Code, the term reasonable means the prevailing professional judgment of psychologists engaged in similar activities in similar circumstances, given the knowledge the psychologist had or should have had at the time. To the degree to which they exercise control, psychologists responsible for announcements, catalogs, brochures, or advertisements describing workshops, seminars, or other non-degree-granting educational programs ensure that they accurately describe the audience for which the program is intended, the educational objectives, the presenters, and the fees involved. People who play video games, even if they are violent, that encourage cooperation are more likely to be helpful to others while gaming than those who play the same games competitively, a 2011 study found. Brad Harris, PhD Texas Christian University, United States Kate Hattrup, PhD San Diego State University, United States John P. In addition, the journal occasionally publishes Commentaries see Kozlowski, S.
Seaton, PhD Arizona State University, United States Andrew Shtulman, PhD Occidental College, United States Judith G. Carter, PhD Southern Illinois University, United States Nathan T. The final author should be preceded by an ampersand. Authors must specifically acknowledge in their JEP: Applied paper that portions of the data have been previously published and provide the complete reference. Nature, 576 7785 , 61β64. However, authors can request a masked review. I am brand new to operating a blog however I do write in my diary on a daily Π¬asis.
American Psychologist, 71, 900. DOI address OR Web address if no DOI available In-text reference Allan, 2010 Allan 2010 found that. Psychologists strive to contribute a portion of their professional time for little or no compensation or personal advantage. Those original posts and comment conversations are still available in an archive. Bloch, MD 1983β1996 Department editors Book and media reviews Kent A. Leung, MD, PhD, MPH UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, United States Abbey K.
The journal also acknowledges that preregistration may not always be appropriate, especially in the exploratory phases of a research project. If the demands of an organization with which psychologists are affiliated or for whom they are working are in conflict with this Ethics Code, psychologists clarify the nature of the conflict, make known their commitment to the Ethics Code, and take reasonable steps to resolve the conflict consistent with the General Principles and Ethical Standards of the Ethics Code. Indeed, such critical reviewers may help strengthen the paper. Likewise, preregistration of analysis plans can be useful for distinguishing confirmatory and exploratory analyses. Writing a journal article review in APA style requires a thorough reading of an article and then present our personal opinions on its subject matter. Title of journal article.
Psychologists create, and to the extent the records are under their control, maintain, disseminate, store, retain, and dispose of records and data relating to their professional and scientific work in order to 1 facilitate provision of services later by them or by other professionals, 2 allow for replication of research design and analyses, 3 meet institutional requirements, 4 ensure accuracy of billing and payments, and 5 ensure compliance with law. The modifiers used in some of the standards of this Ethics Code e. Preregistration of studies and analysis plans Preregistration of studies and specific hypotheses can be a useful tool for making strong theoretical claims. American Journal of Human Genetics, 105 6 , 1076-1090. The articles examine identity in developmental stages ranging from early childhood to young adulthood, and represent samples from 5 different countries. You can check on this by looking up the references the author cites.
Other formatting instructions, as well as instructions on preparing tables, figures, references, metrics, and abstracts, appear in the Manual. Gabriel, PhD University of Arizona, United States Alicia A. DeNisi, PhD Tulane University, United States Richard P. Here is the sample content they sent me β Let me know if you think I should go ahead and use AI. In the text of your paper, you may have some abbreviations such as UN for United Nations , but in the full references, always include the full names of the corporation or organization following Section 9.
