Carr is google making us stupid. Nicholas Carr 2022-10-27
Carr is google making us stupid Rating:
In his 2008 article "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", Nicholas Carr argues that the internet and specifically search engines like Google are rewiring our brains and making us less able to focus and think deeply. He cites several studies that suggest that the constant multitasking and information overload of the internet age is leading to a decline in deep reading and critical thinking skills.
Carr points out that the internet has greatly expanded our access to information and made it easier for us to find answers to our questions. However, he argues that this ease of access has led us to rely on the internet as a crutch, rather than using it as a tool to supplement our own knowledge and understanding. He cites studies that show that people who use the internet frequently tend to have shorter attention spans and are more prone to distractions.
Carr also argues that the internet is changing the way we process information. With search engines like Google, we can find information quickly and easily, but we may not be taking the time to critically analyze or synthesize that information. We may also be more likely to rely on shallow, surface-level information rather than digging deeper and engaging with more complex ideas.
Overall, Carr's argument is that the internet and specifically search engines like Google are making us less able to focus and think deeply, and that this is having negative consequences for our ability to understand and process complex ideas. While the internet has certainly expanded our access to information and made it easier for us to find answers, it is important that we also make an effort to engage with that information critically and to maintain our ability to think deeply and focus.
Critical Response on "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr: [Essay Example], 876 words GradesFixer
As the two most outspoken detractors of electronic media, Carr and Birkerts were both appealed to by The Big Switch that long-term psychological and neurological studies were required to definitively ascertain how cognition develops under the influence of the Internet. Carr adds his own information to gain a trust with his reader by using ethos. By not appealing to both the brain and the heart, his effort to persuade a great number of people is overall ineffective. When presented with a long book or article, I immediately turn to the back of the book or search for the abstract of the article. Through email, twitter these communication methods, users can have 36 dialogs simultaneously but not focus on any of these. Though Google and other knowledge-finding and knowledge-building technologies might speed up existing human computational processes, they might also foreclose the human potential to easily create new knowledge. Do I believe that Google is making us stupid? In the quiet spaces opened up by the sustained, undistracted reading of a book, or by any other act of contemplation, for that matter, we make our own associations, draw our own inferences and analogies, foster our own ideas.
Is Google Making Us Stupid: Why Carr’s Argument Is Not Effective: [Essay Example], 1050 words GradesFixer
Although, Carr claims, many do not do this, they simply read snippets of the article and believe all claims are for certain. He mainly sees change as a big loss. This allows for a student to learn more about particular subjects, giving them more knowledge faster, and making them less stupid. Therefore, he is a firsthand witness of the fact that all of these things are true because they happened to himself. Instead of going with our instinct and senses, we have decided to adjust ourselves to other technologies. Once he had mastered touch-typing, he was able to write with his eyes closed, using only the tips of his fingers.
Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Article Review
The result is to scatter our attention and diffuse our concentration. In most of the situations, the internet is still regarded as an important information receiver. When I kept continuing to read his article, I noticed that he quotes a developmental psychologist named, Maryanne Wolf. But it also took something away. Learn More We still find ourselves in the natural state we were before. Topical Issues in Communications and Media Research.
Lastly, Carr revisits the 2001: A Space Odyssey scene he used to open the article. Ambiguity is not an opening for insight but a bug to be fixed. How to cite APA In-text: People … Gaudin, 2009. Find Out How UKEssays. This is certainly where the harm surfaces. Television programs add text crawls and pop-up ads, and magazines and newspapers shorten their articles, introduce capsule summaries, and crowd their pages with easy-to-browse info-snippets.
Everyone except my 5- and 3-year-old will read for an hour. Ultimately, literate humans are less introduced to natural details, an aspect that will not even enable them to read the written texts. Yet, this is almost exactly the same argument that Carr is making against the internet. When Carr mentions that brains are outdated, he alludes to the fact that computers are on a higher level than the brain itself. Works Cited Carr, Nicholas. Second, he examined the thought process of his colleagues. People used to think that our mental meshwork, the dense connections formed among the 100 billion or so neurons inside our skulls, was largely fixed by the time we reached adulthood.
Carr uses pathos in a way that elicits a sense of fear in his readers. So, is google making us stupid as Nicholas Carr said? However, Carr seemed to include appeals to emotion more often than logic. In the end, the argument of Carr revolves around his strange outlook of the Web or Internet. It injects the medium's content with hyperlinks, blinking ads, and other digital gewgaws, and it surrounds the content with the content of other media it has absorbed. As a point of fact, it is always easy to criticize any new thing because we have not yet tested its positive sides.
I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. The average page length of the 20 th century novel is significantly less. His claim was centered on a personal experience in conjunction with the experience of other skilled writers when it came to the way they go through certain mental tasks. Are we becoming smarter or dumber due to internet use? Just like chemical narcotics. Cover hummingbird photo by Dan Pancamo www. If I do a critical analysis of my Google and social media feeds these days, the first observation I will make is how the ads on my feed seem to be perfectly tailored to me.
Technology is also super helpful in communication. What deserves our attention is, though the information we collect from websites is specific authority dictates. Eventually, an hour passes and I find that I have followed a path with very little meaning. Carr begins the essay by saying that his recent problems with concentrating on reading lengthy texts, including the books and articles that he used to read effortlessly, spending too much time on the Internet. As Carr notes in his article, Socrates was dismayed at the invention of written language believing it would lead to a decline in thought and ability. Still, Carr concludes his argument on an ambivalent note, citing a quote by Richard Foreman that laments the erosion of educated and articulate people. Our brains do not have to change for the internet, we developed with it.
An Analysis of Nicholas Carr's "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" Essay Example
Carr argues that technology forces the reader, and the experienced writer, into a different manner of writing based on influence of the medium. The more they use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing. For example, he writes about Scott Karp, who has been excessive about reading, but now that the Internet is readily available, he finds it more and more difficult to immerse himself in a book. Computerworld, 2009, web address. This was manifested while in the process of reading books, and the creation of significant literary works that required deep thought and several hours of study. Carr argues that while speech is an innate ability that stems directly from brain structure, reading is conscious and taught. My brain has started to apply the routine of information management from Facebook to all scenarios involving information management.
. They lay out a number of challenges associated with the Internet that Carr failed to specify in his argument. This is not based on science. He stated repeatedly how prior to the popularization of the internet, information was difficult to obtain, especially due to class structure. Overall, I think a lot of his techniques and tools that he uses when writing his article was aimed towards people that will most likely believe in his ideas and viewpoints which makes sense.