In his book "Eros and Civilization," philosopher Herbert Marcuse explores the relationship between sexuality, repression, and social progress. Marcuse argues that traditional Western society is characterized by a repressive hierarchy, in which the ruling class uses mechanisms of control, such as the family and religion, to suppress the natural drives of the individual. This repression, Marcuse argues, leads to a state of "surplus repression," in which people are not able to fully realize their potential and live fulfilling lives.
One of the central concepts in Marcuse's theory is the idea of "eros." Eros is the life instinct, the drive towards pleasure, creativity, and self-expression. In traditional society, Marcuse argues, eros is suppressed and redirected towards socially-approved channels, such as procreation and the nuclear family. This suppression of eros leads to a sense of alienation and discontent among the masses, who are unable to fully express their desires and passions.
Marcuse believes that the key to social progress is the liberation of eros. He argues that a society in which the individual is free to fully express their desires and passions will be more creative, productive, and fulfilling. In such a society, traditional hierarchies and structures of repression would be dismantled, and people would be able to live in greater harmony with one another and with nature.
However, Marcuse also recognizes that the liberation of eros is not without its challenges. In a society in which traditional structures of repression are dismantled, there is the potential for chaos and conflict. Marcuse believes that it is important to find a balance between the suppression of eros and its liberation, in order to create a society that is both fulfilling and stable.
In conclusion, Herbert Marcuse's theory of eros offers a unique perspective on the relationship between sexuality, repression, and social progress. Marcuse's ideas continue to influence discussions about sexuality, freedom, and social change to this day.
Cultural Reader: Summary: Eros and Civilization by Herbert Marcuse
He was interested in the revolutionary and transformative function of art. The unconscious retains the objectives of the defeated pleasure principle. . The Logos shows forth as the logic of domination. It is here where Marcuse, relying on his distinction between basic and surplus repression, goes beyond Freud. In his critique of Marcuse, Foucault writes: I would also distinguish myself from para-Marxist like Marcuse who give the notion of repression an exaggerated role—because power would be a fragile thing if its only function were to repress, if it worked only through the mode of censorship, exclusion, blockage and repression, in the manner of a great Superego, exercising itself only in a negative way. Hence, bourgeois culture creates an interior of the human being where the highest ideals of culture can be realized.
Marcuse: Eros & Civilization, Contents
However, many are still in poverty. Within the context of historical happening, within material existence, what the human being could potentially be is already present. Lukes, Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. In affirmative culture art becomes the object of spiritual contemplation. The constant interrelation between the two levels means that recurrent cross-references, anticipations, and repetitions are unavoidable.
Frankfurt School: Eros and Civilization by Herbert Marcuse
A branch office was established in Geneva where Marcuse began his work with the Institute. Erich Fromm: His Life and Ideas 2000 that Fromm, in a letter to the philosopher Eros and Civilization as an incompetent distortion of Freud and "the expression of an alienation and despair masquerading as radicalism" and referred to Marcuse's "ideas for the future man" as irrational and sickening. This simply means that if an individual group seeks liberation, their analysis or critique of society must come to terms with how things actually work at that moment in that society if any form of liberation is possible. In addition to having two daughters, Marshall is a Vietnam vet, a former marine, and a recipient. Rather, identities are formed through power and certain discursive practices. He would go to Paris for a short time and then finally in July 1934 to New York. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 2005.