Matthew n fraser speech. What did matthew fraser say? 2022-10-27

Matthew n fraser speech Rating: 7,8/10 1139 reviews

Matthew N. Fraser is a well-known public speaker who has given numerous speeches on a variety of topics. One of his most famous speeches is his commencement address at the New London High School in Connecticut, which went viral on the internet and garnered widespread attention.

In this speech, Fraser addresses the importance of free speech and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. He argues that free speech is a cornerstone of democracy and that it is crucial for individuals to be able to express their ideas and opinions freely, even if they are controversial or unpopular.

Fraser also discusses the challenges that young people face in exercising their right to free speech, particularly in the age of social media and online activism. He encourages his audience to use their voice and speak out on issues that matter to them, even if it means facing backlash or criticism.

One of the highlights of Fraser's speech is his discussion of the concept of "cancel culture," in which individuals or groups are ostracized or ostracized by society for expressing unpopular views or committing perceived offenses. Fraser argues that cancel culture is harmful to free speech and can have a chilling effect on the free exchange of ideas.

In conclusion, Matthew N. Fraser's speech on free speech is a powerful and thought-provoking examination of this crucial concept. His words serve as a reminder of the importance of protecting and promoting free speech, and the vital role it plays in a healthy democracy.

What did Mathew Fraser say?

matthew n fraser speech

Respondents are Steven Pico, Jacqueline Gold, Glenn Yarris, Russell Rieger, and Paul Sochinski. These include serious or severe bullying or harassment targeting particular individuals; threats aimed at teachers or other students; the failure to follow rules concerning lessons, the writing of papers, the use of computers, or participation in other online school activities; and breaches of school security devices, including material maintained within school computers. It was a 15-foot joke. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In addition to the important function of schools in transmitting our culture's values, we must consider the tradition of judicial deference to the discretion of local school authorities in the management of school affairs. Today, Mary Beth Tinker is a nurse, caring for her ailing mother.

Next

Matthew Fraser Speech

matthew n fraser speech

Fraser suspended for lewd speech Fraser for delivering a speech laced with sexual references before a student assembly. Nicholson did involve the compulsory environment of the classroom. During the entire speech Mathew referred to his candidate using sexual metaphors. See also Diamond, The First Amendment and Public Schools: The Case Against Judicial Intervention, 59 Tex. Accordingly, this case does not concern speech or action that intrudes upon the work of the schools or the rights of other students. The argument that was more persuasive was the school board because they had more evidence to support their argument. See Board of Education v.

Next

Matthew Fraser speech

matthew n fraser speech

Des Moine In 1969, Des Moines Iowa school districts, it was fine to wear the iron cross to support Nazis but it was not okay to wear arm bands to support stopping the Vietnam War. Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded. He was wearing a T-shirt which contained statements that disparaged the homosexual community. Mathew argument was least persuasive because his evidence does not support his argument. These themes draw similar emotions in all men, no matter their background; all men have the need for honour, the urge to please the deity they believe in, and the need to trust in their fellow men. But our Constitution says we must take this risk and our history says that it is this sort of hazardous freedom — this kind of openness — that is the basis of our national strength and of the independence and vigor of Americans who grow up and live in this relatively permissive, often disputatious, society.

Next

Student Speech

matthew n fraser speech

While the students' reaction to Fraser's speech may fairly be characterized as boisterous, it was hardly disruptive of the educational process. What is the holding conclusion of Bethel? In December, 1965, a group of adults and students in Des Moines held a meeting at the Eckhardt home. We granted certiorari to decide whether the First Amendment prevents a school district from disciplining a high school student for giving a lewd speech at a school assembly. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Fraser gave his speech during an assembly in the school auditorium. Board of Regents, 385 U. Fraser — Case Briefs — 1985 Bethel School District No.

Next

Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser

matthew n fraser speech

The District argues that we should adopt the view expressed by Judge Newman that the doctrine of Pacifica should be extended to the high school context. They are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. Fraser and the Curtailment of Student Rights. Any departure from absolute regimentation may cause trouble. Finally, even if the majority were correct that the principal could constitutionally have censored the objectionable material, I would emphatically object to the brutal manner in which he did so. An Analysis Of Winston Churchill's Their Finest Hour Speech 815 Words 4 Pages An Analysis of Churchill 's "Their Finest Hour" Speech Sir Winston Churchill was born to an aristocratic family in 1874, and he was the prime minister of the United Kingdom. Once you do, we hope you will support our work with a charitable gift.

Next

Matthew N. Fraser, a Minor, and E.L. Fraser, as His Guardian Ad Litem v. Bethel School District..., 755 F.2d 1356

matthew n fraser speech

The narrow question before the Second Circuit was whether the school officials made an adequate showing to justify their prohibition of the distribution of the questionnaire. When this directive was carried out, it became publicized, and the Board issued a press release justifying its action. We fear that if school officials had the unbridled discretion to apply a standard as subjective and elusive as "indecency" in controlling the speech of high school students, it would increase the risk of cementing white, middle-class standards for determining what is acceptable and proper speech and behavior in our public schools. Our Constitution does not permit the official suppression of ideas. Fraser was not talking to children too young to read; he was speaking to young adults, many of whom as high school seniors on the eve of graduation would have already reached voting age. Which restricted Mathew from giving his speech because it was an educational setting.

Next

Refer to the passage below. On April 26, 1983, Matthew N. Fraser, a student at Bethel High School in

matthew n fraser speech

The article did not contain graphic accounts of sexual activity. Rodriguez, To the extent that schools are expected to transmit society's values, local school boards are in the better position to determine what these values are. It follows that a substantial degree of social propriety is called for in the operation of an effective educational system. We fear that if school officials had the unbridled discretion to apply a standard as subjective and elusive as "indecency" in controlling the speech of high school students, it would increase the risk of cementing white, middle-class standards for determining what is acceptable and proper speech and behavior in our public schools. Some students were reported as bewildered by the speech and the reaction of mimicry it provoked.

Next

Summary Of Matthew Fraser Speech

matthew n fraser speech

We properly read it to permit reasonable regulation of speech-connected activities in carefully restricted circumstances. Speech and Expression Student Speech Tinker v. Fraser, then a seventeen-year-old senior at Bethel High School in Tacoma, Washington, nominated a friend and classmate for school office at a student-run assembly called for that purpose. The father sought injunctive and monetary damages under 42 U. Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment and therefore may be restricted include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial … How did Bethel vs Fraser get to the Supreme Court? Fraser could take to limit its impact.

Next

What did Matthew N Fraser say?

matthew n fraser speech

That court appears to have proceeded on the theory that the use of lewd and obscene speech in order to make what the speaker considered to be a point in a nominating speech for a fellow student was essentially the same as the wearing of an armband in Tinker as a form of protest or the expression of a political position. Mathew Fraser and his parents vs. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Two of Fraser's teachers, with whom he discussed the contents of his speech in advance, informed him that the speech was "inappropriate and that he probably should not deliver it," and that his delivery of the speech might have "severe consequences. The majority erred in failing to address them. Unlike the sanctions imposed on the students wearing armbands in Tinker, the penalties imposed in this case were unrelated to any political viewpoint. This case can be better understood by studying the Des Moines independent schools, students and their policies, examining the decision of the court and, reflecting on how it has influenced society today.

Next

Bethel School District v. Fraser

matthew n fraser speech

School principals have a difficult job, and a vitally important one. Some students hooted and yelled; some by gestures graphically simulated the sexual activities pointedly alluded to in respondent's speech. It is this standard, rather than our decision in Tinker, that governs this case. That question, however, was discussed by Judge Newman in his separate concurring opinion. Board of Education, 425 F. Judge Kaufmann, nevertheless, questioned the soundness of Judge Newman's view on the issue of on-campus distribution: "We would hesitate, however, to conclude that the obvious need for a flexible application of the First Amendment in the school setting allows educational officials free-wheeling and unbridled discretion to prohibit expression they regard as indecent, even within the narrow confines of the schoolhouse.

Next