In India, a person who has been summoned to appear in court has a legal obligation to do so. If a person fails to appear in court when required, it is referred to as "non-appearance." There can be serious consequences for non-appearance in court, as it can be viewed as a breach of the legal process and a lack of respect for the judicial system.
There are various reasons why a person might fail to appear in court. They may be unaware of the summons, may have a legitimate reason for not being able to attend, or may simply choose to ignore the summons. In some cases, a person may be afraid to appear in court due to fear of retribution or a lack of confidence in the legal system.
If a person fails to appear in court without a valid reason, they may be charged with contempt of court. This is a serious offense that can result in fines, imprisonment, or both. In addition to these penalties, the person's case may be adversely affected if they fail to appear in court, as they will not have the opportunity to present their side of the story or challenge any evidence presented against them.
There are measures in place to ensure that people who have been summoned to appear in court are aware of their obligations. In many cases, summonses are served in person by a court officer, and the person being summoned is required to sign a receipt acknowledging receipt of the summons. If a person does not receive the summons or does not understand the significance of the summons, they may still be held accountable for non-appearance in court.
It is important for people who have been summoned to appear in court to take the summons seriously and make every effort to attend the court proceedings. If a person is unable to attend due to a valid reason, they should inform the court as soon as possible and request an adjournment. By appearing in court as required, a person can ensure that their case is dealt with fairly and that their rights are protected.
Appearance & Consequence of Non
In these circumstances, let court notice be issued to the counsel for accused Umar Khalid for arguments on December 14, 2022, the court ordered on Tuesday. It has been held by the Supreme Court that it is the duty of the court to ensure that statements in the plaint stand proven and the prayers before the court are worthy of being granted. After all fiscal or civil rights are in no way inferior to right to Liberty and a litigant seeking indulgence of the court cannot be denied justice just because his lawyer did not attend the proceedings in the court. ร If service of the summons is proved then only the court can proceed for an ex-parte against the defendant and the court may pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff. I cannot come to the court for every date till end of next year. In the case of, Raman Arunachalam Madhumilan Syntex Ltd. Dismissal of the suit of the plaintiff without hearing him is a serious matter and it should not be adopted unless the court gets satisfied that in the interest of justice such dismissal is required, as cited by Beaumont, C.
What are the effects of Non
Support Our Journalism India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. The defendant against whom ex-parte decree has been passed may apply for setting it aside. Bhasin Dismissing a suit in default is a decision, but simply consigning the case to records for default is no decision. A party should not be deprived of hearing unless there has been something equivalent to misconduct or rash negligence on her part. Thereafter, R is able to establish that, P has no title to the property and thus, is not entitled to the relief of declaration sought by him. Later, on July 16, the High Court had dismissed the application for restoration saying that no grounds for restoration were made out. But,it is enough if he proves that he attempted to remain present when the suit was called on for hearing.