"The Lowest Animal" is an essay written by Mark Twain in which he examines the idea that humans are the lowest animals on the evolutionary scale. Twain begins the essay by discussing the various behaviors and characteristics of animals, pointing out that they are often more noble and virtuous than humans. For example, Twain notes that animals are honest, loyal, and live in harmony with one another, while humans are often deceitful, treacherous, and prone to violence.
Twain then goes on to conduct a thought experiment in which he imagines a group of animals observing human behavior and trying to understand it. He posits that the animals would be disgusted by the things that humans do, such as going to war, practicing slavery, and engaging in other forms of cruelty. The animals would conclude that humans are the lowest of all animals, not because they are physically inferior, but because of their lack of moral character.
Twain concludes the essay by suggesting that humans have the potential to be better than they currently are. He argues that we have the capacity to be more like the animals, living in harmony with one another and treating each other with kindness and respect. However, Twain is pessimistic about the likelihood of this happening, given the current state of the world and the many problems that plague human society.
In summary, "The Lowest Animal" is an essay in which Mark Twain critiques the behavior of humans and suggests that we have much to learn from animals. Twain argues that we are the lowest animals on the evolutionary scale not because of our physical attributes, but because of our lack of moral character and our tendency towards violence and deceit. Despite this, Twain believes that we have the capacity to be better, and he encourages us to strive for a more harmonious and virtuous way of life.
Guiding Questions Mark Twain The Lowest Animal
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-683484482-5b3ce78746e0fb005b553ec3.jpg)
In twain has pronounced from. The rest of them were left for decaying, one anaconda eats one buffalo and showed no further interest for eating the rest of them. He made assassins of other people and washes his hand like he has done nothing. He takes the possession of others land and destroys it. How effective is his use of satire in achieving that purpose? The higher animals engage in individual fights, but never in organized masses. I think it is open to dispute. And in the intervals between campaigns, he washes the blood off his hands and works for the universal brotherhood of man, with his mouth.
Mark twain the lowest animal questions
Man when he is a North American Indian gouges out his prisoner's eyes; when he is King John, with a nephew to render untroublesome, he uses a red-hot iron; when he is a religious zealot dealing with heretics in the Middle Ages, he skins his captive alive and scatters salt on his back; in the first Richard's time he shuts up a multitude of Jew families in a tower and sets fire to it; in Columbus's time he captures a family of Spanish Jews and but that is not printable; in our day in England a man is fined ten shillings for beating his mother nearly to death with a chair, and another man is fined forty shillings for having four pheasant eggs in his possession without being able to satisfactorily explain how he got them. Our experts pass a test and qualify series of training session to make sure that they attain the best skills to provide you high quality Essay and Dissertation writing service. He also explains that the human being is a religious animal whereas animals lack such things. Rabies enables a man to do a thing, which he could not do when in a healthy state: kill his neighbor with a poisonous bite. We gave it up and tried the other. It is a perplexing business.
The Lowest Animal complianceportal.american.edu
He has always been a slave in one form or another, and has always held other slaves in bondage under him in one way or another. I consider that the strongest count against his intelligence is the fact that with that record back of him he blandly sets himself up as the head animal of the lot: whereas by his own standards he is the bottom one. I think it is open to dispute. Among the higher animals there is no trace of them. I could have spoken up I want to sit on the low stool in Big Mama's. He will not even enter a drawing room with his breast and back naked, so alive are he and his mates to indecent suggestion. No one, then, can be the better man for having the Moral Sense.
Man is The Animal that Laughs. In our day he is always some mans slave for wages, and does that mans work; and this slave has other slaves under him for minor wages, and they do his work. No one is the better man for having rabies: The Moral Sense enables a man to do wrong. These qualities are dependent upon their size, color, food needs, etc. Man is the only Patriot.
